image1

In large part, the terms of a written agreement between parties are the sole item considered when interpreting the items of an agreement upon a dispute between parties. The “parole evidence rule” is a common law principle which bars factors outside a written agreement to contradict the terms of a written contract except in cases of fraud, illegality, duress, or in some cases mistakes and ambiguity the written agreement. Oral promises made before or when a written agreement are entered that contradict a written agreement, cannot be considered when a dispute arises under common law principles.

However, a recent court decision has changed this basic rule when it reversed long-standing precedent by holding that evidence of broken oral promises that contradict the express terms of a written contract are no longer barred by the parole evidence rule.

Visit our website for more information and to make sure your interests are protected!

Assistance

Submit details below

Related Posts

Continue Reading

Business

Capital Losses VS. Ordinary Losses

[caption id="attachment_884" align="alignleft" width="346"] Capital Loss Vs. Ordinary Loss[/caption] Capital Losses and Ordinary Losses Receive Different Tax Treatment A capital...

Read More >>
The “Cayman Sandwich”
Asset Protection

The “Cayman Sandwich”

A Powerful Tool for Latin American Startups In the dynamic business landscape of Latin America, startups and growing businesses face...

Read More >>
Business

Worker’s Compensation Fraud Concerns Small Business Owners

A recent study found that one in five small business owners, defined by this sample as having under 100 employees,...

Read More >>